If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause issues for users.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.
Although what is a safe distance from a cell tower may sound like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those living further far from antennas.
However, this study also found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
safe distance from cell tower is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a shield against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower include the erroneous assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.