If you've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used mobile phone, then you've probably realized that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it.
While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further distance from them.
But, the study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.