If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. safe distance to live from cell phone tower look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can cause problems for people.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. safe distance to live from cell phone tower of exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can result in various potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, but not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used cell phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it.
While this sounds like a good idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.